Thursday, July 18, 2019

Martin Luther King V. Malcolm X

Alan mason Period 8 Martin Luther major power v. Malcolm X Martin Luther nance has been known for utilize heartsease to help him suffer compare among alone mountain but especially Afri feces-Americans. He was non the type of leader that resorted to delirium in order to get the reachity that he fought for. fag has been known for sorrowful stack by the use of his speeches standardised Kings I Have a day-dream and Vie Been to the Mountaintop speeches. King shows through with(predicate) these speeches that plain though he was monishmined to get equal fulls for every black, he as only handout to stick to subtle, peaceful ship canal homogeneous court cases, hold out, and boycotts.This ism is the exact oppo flummoxe to Malcolm X, an new(prenominal) civic Rights Leader, who thought that African American should non waste their time on protest and boycotts (Document 7). Malcolm, like King, was not in upgrade of fury but believe that African Americans should by a ll meaner use violence to protect themselves when they attacked by racists (Document 9). But, Martin Luther Kings doctrine was much unspoiled for the African-American familiarity consequently Malcolm Axs because the try that he put Into his nonviolent philosophy made gaining rights to a greater extent lucky and more meaningful.Martin Luther King showed that he had the check philosophy compared to Malcolm X because of his stance on violence. One way King upheld his beliefs was through protest. King verbalise In his Our beau ideal Is Marching speech, We are on the shine now. The burning of our churches will not deter us. We are on the move now. The bomb of our homes will not dissuade us (Document 4). So Protesters, Including King himself were having their homes burned subject for retesting for what they believe Is right. In March of 1965 King and other protesters walked In order to overdress awareness of the need for a right to vote Right Act. This Act was passed later that year.But dismantle though they achieved their goal for voting right does not mean that the protesters did not induce opposition for their actions. Mass arrest, police attacks, and body politic troopers blockading all occurred throughout the walk. If King chose to fight back then that could gain either delayed getting the voting Right Act approved, or It whitethorn take a shit been felt that African-Americans did not deserve to get the Act approved. But King Just showed by obtaining from violence you can still get what you loss. Martin Luther King showed that thither were other ways to fight for what you want aside form fighting Itself.King did this by using boycotts and strikes. He said, There Is zero quite so effective as refusal to cooperate economically with the forces and Institutions. King recognise that one of the ways he was deprivation to get American to give them the rights that African-Americans treasured was by disrupting the flow of money that was going Into the Caucasian shops. This meaner by not purchase from places that o not offer Jobs for African-Americans then those businesses would see how much they needed the African-American community, even If It meant having to hire African- American workers.Malcolm X did not agree with boycotts and strikes he said, We have to learn how to own and operate the businesses of our community and develop to be involved in picketing and boycotting other people in other communities in order to get a Job (Document 7). But this idea completely went against the philosophy of being together not separate. If this would have happened then the country would eave ever been separate and things would have never been equal.Martin Luther top executive has been known for using his words instead of his fist when it comes to defending what he legion(predicate) thousands of others believed to be correct. King once said in his I Have a Dream speech that he had a dream that former grave workers and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the shelve of brotherhood They will not be Judged by the color of their skin but by their character We will be able to work together, pray together, to effort together, to go o Jail together, to climb up for freedom together (Document 2).King fought for African Americans rights by using his words. He told the people of his desires for and equal and fair life where people could live in harmony with each(prenominal) other and not be judged by their skin tone. He thought of a time where there would be no more separate but equal as were stated prior, people would be able to work together And go to Jail together. (Document 2) So by using his speeches where thousands of people came to listen to him talk, he locomote a nation to be in favor of his reasonings.In conclusion, Martin Luther Kings philosophy was more beneficial for the African- American community then Malcolm Axs because the effort that he put into his nonviolen t philosophy made gaining rights more successful and more meaningful. King kept up with his no violence idea by dynamic in other things that got Americas attention like protest, boycotts and speeches. King strives to achieve equality and because of his hard efforts he has succeeded in more ways than one to help African-Americans get the same civil rights as Caucasian Americans.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.